Archive for September, 2007

Why I’m Voting “At Large” for Saint John

Wednesday, September 26th, 2007

Next month, Saint Johners will decide whether a ward system or an “at large” system is right for the city in the plebiscite (you have NO idea how hard that word is to spell).

At first glance, a ward system is tempting because it reduces the number of candidates on the ballot and ensures local representation. For some issues, this can be very important, particularly in the “neglected” residential areas of the city. However, I don’t think I can support a ward system for Saint John. Here’s why.

First of all, a ward system makes it easier for “bad” candidates to get elected if no “good” candidates run in a certain area. We have this art perfected already in Saint John. Let’s NOT make that easier.

Secondly, the ward system would transform Saint John from one city into four smaller communities based on the ward boundaries. Elected councilors would feel more obligated to represent the issues facing their own ward instead of thinking of the overall greater picture. If we ever amalgamate with Grand-Bay Westfield, Rothesay and Quispamsis, then perhaps a ward system would be useful then to allow those communities to elect councillors separately from the “old Saint John”, but I don’t think it’s a good idea for us right now.

Thirdly, consider the proposal right now to bastardize UNBSJ into some form of polytechnic. Since the university is physically located in the proposed “ward 2″ (North), responsibility for addressing this issue may fall onto the 2 councillors elected from that area alone, despite the fact that the university has impacts affecting the whole city. The councillors from the East and West wards may not involve themselves too much with the issue since it’s perhaps more out of sight and out of mind for those residents.

In the end, I don’t think it will be the end of the world if we do move to a ward system. That said, residents of Saint John should be cautious before viewing a ward system as a solution to all of our problems.

Let me know what you think, if you agree with me or not.

Unfair comparison to Arizona State

Sunday, September 23rd, 2007

To sell the report on post-secondary education, Dr. Rick Miner has, on a couple occasions, used Arizona State as an example of a university that has transitioned to become “Arizona State Polytechnic Institute”. He actually used that name in last Monday’s open house. This is completely false, as my quick research shows that they do have a polytechnic as one of 4 total campuses within their university. Clearly, the Commission is trying to use the good name of Arizona State University (ASU) and others to push this agenda-driven report.

I took the liberty of e-mailing ASU President Michael Crow to briefly summarize what is happening here, and see what he has to say about it. This was a long shot especially since over 50,000 students attend this huge university, and perhaps he might have been too busy to reply to me.

Here is the e-mail I sent:

I am student at the University of New Brunswick campus in Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada (UNBSJ). We are currently in the midst of a major fight to save our university from being closed to make way for a new polytechnic institution to replace it as well as our local community college. This idea has come from a report produced by an “independent” commission formed by the government to look at post-secondary education options with two commissioners, one of which, Dr. Rick Miner, who is part of an advocacy group that promotes polytechnics in Canada.

My concern that leads me to write to you is that false statements are being made involving your university by these commissioners to support their agenda-driven report. In a radio interview, Dr. Miner claims that Arizona State University is one example of a school that has transitioned from a university to become a polytechnic institute. (To hear it yourself, refer to “The Report on Post Secondary Education” for Sept. 17, external link) This seems to be very incorrect, as quick research on your web site shows that you are indeed still a university, and that only one of your many campuses is a polytechnic. Please correct me if I am wrong here. This is very different from what we would have here in Saint John, as the university would disappear, and be replaced by the polytechnic which would be independent from the other schools. There’s nothing wrong with a polytechnic, but I support only in addition to our existing university.

I would be delighted to hear back from you with your thoughts about these statements, and your response to how your fine university’s name is being used as ammunition against a university on the other side of the continent. I know we certainly wouldn’t like it here if advocacy groups from somewhere else tried to drag our institution into a political debate by twisting facts and presenting a skewed vision of how we operate.

A couple days later, I did receive a reply:

Paul:

Thank you for your e-mail. You are correct that we are a university that encompasses multiple campuses, one of which is a polytechnic. Arizona State University is comprised of four campuses of equal quality and differentiated focus. The Arizona Board of Regents, which oversees the Arizona university system, has assigned ASU a specific mandate to enhance access to higher education in our state. As a result, ASU currently absorbs over 90% of the growth in our university system and, in order to accommodate this growth, it was necessary for us to expand beyond our first campus in Tempe. It became imperative to establish additional campuses in the Phoenix metropolitan area and to align our curriculum so that each campus has its own specific areas of academic concentration. We call this strategic approach “One University in Many Places.

I hope this information is helpful and I thank you again for writing.

Michael M. Crow
President

His message provides reinforcement to my earlier research. Their strategic approach is somewhat similar to what is happening in New Brunswick, in that the government has given directives to a university. The important difference here is that they didn’t close their university in order to open a polytechnic or other type of school. They added new campuses in the same city with their own focused efforts. The same could exist in Saint John with separate polytechnic/college and university institutions.

A “done” deal CAN be undone

Wednesday, September 19th, 2007

Some people are easily discouraged by this issue. Even though they support UNBSJ, they feel this is a done deal that is going to go through anyway. Judging by Shawn Graham’s comments lately, he seems intent on pushing this through since that’s easier than checking first to make sure that doing so isn’t only the hugest mistake in the history of the world. (Enjoy that statement, there would be a lot less drama and history classes available in Saint John with a polytechnic!)

Getting discouraged is NOT an option for this issue. Let me tell you that this “done” deal (if it really is already set in stone) is one that WILL get UN-done. We must fight to keep a university in Saint John using a wide variety of methods, and getting as many different groups and types of people involved as possible. Friends of yours that own a business, work for a business, or are in some position of power anywhere are all in a position to be affected even indirectly by what the university, and they all should have a say. The Premier can only ignore support and facts supporting UNBSJ for so long before he will have to pause for a second, and listen to what people are really saying instead of what is contained in an agenda-driven report.

If you don’t do this, go to the shame corner right away! Rick Miner and Jacques L’Ecuyer (Commissioners of Committed on Post-Secondary Degradation) will keep you company there.

Supporting UNBSJ

Tuesday, September 18th, 2007

Before I begin, I must note that I have recently purchased a brand new wireless keyboard from Staples, so I may make some typing mistakes. Please forgive me, as no one benefits in a world of typos.

On Monday, I was very proud and happy to have been part of such a spirited and peaceful rally in Uptown Saint John in support of our university. For my readers not from the local area, you may not be aware that Saint John’s campus of the University of New Brunswick has become threatened by a report released last week by the Commission of Post-Secondary Destruction (oops, sorry, that’s Post-Secondary Education. Stupid keyboard!). In short, it is their plan to improve post-secondary education by closing Saint John’s only university (as well as two other small ones) and replacing it with a bastardized “polytechnic”. One of the Commissioners is Dickhead Miner (sorry, Rick is actually his name, the R and D buttons are reaaaally close together), a former vice-president of UNBSJ turned traitor. His portrait hangs in the UNBSJ library, albeit with a few improvements since the report came out.

rick_minor_shame.jpg

Don’t worry, he was already blind enough before to not be able to see what New Brunswick really needs and does not need.

Monday began with classes as usual, until it was time to board a free shuttle bus for uptown to attend the Rally in King’s Square.

img_4065.jpg

My whole argument, which is common among many supporters, is that we have nothing to lose by adding a polytechnic to Saint John. However, this must NOT come at the expense of our university which we have been building for 40 years.

img_4068.jpg

This is not a small issue for Saint Johners. The rally was a huge success with 2,000 people showing up for the march down to Ed Doherty’s office. Everything went entirely peaceful. Ed Doherty gave a speech which did not support protecting UNBSJ at all, which no one in the crowd was enjoying whatsoever. The crowd was chanting “bullshit” a few appropriate times. Ed eventually got a bit frightened by our peaceful protest, and went into hiding in his office.

At this point, one of my professors, Dr. Littlejohn, took the microphone after the crowd began chanting his name.

littlejohn.jpg

He’s a real nice guy, very passionate about this issue. He’s also well connected, and knows his stuff about this issue. He is a friend of Ed Doherty’s and the Liberal party and helped them with their speeches in the last election. As difficult as it is, Dr. Littlejohn is going against these people to call them out as the liars they are being and pleading with them to do the right thing.

Later in the day was the presentation by the commissioners at the Delta hotel. Before they arrived a half hour late because of a flight delay (probably as a result of flying too high in their dream world), the mayor spoke, or tried to anyway…

elsie_norm.jpg

Norm (approaching microphone): Oh, come on, let me speak.
Elsie (rushing up to speak a second time): Oh don’t you worry, I will let you speak. (not exact quotes)
And then they both spoke a bit, and Mayor Norm said the council meeting was starting, and that’s why no councillors will be present.

Not long after, the commissioners (shown below, disturbing image warning!) made their entrance to a crowd chanting “Traitor” in a room which the Delta had to expand to accommodate everyone. This set the mood for the night.

commissioners1.jpg

Many of their statements were so ridiculous that the crowd broke into laughter. A few lies also slipped through, some unfortunately undetected. Dr. Miner (left) justified the report saying that Arizona State University is one example of a school that used to be a university, but is now a polytechnic. I thought, wow, maybe this idea has actually flown in some places. This would have been a good response on their response, if it wasn’t a lie. A quick visit to the school’s web site shows that they are actually still very much a “university”. Wikipedia reveals that only one of their many campuses is a polytechnic, and was opened in 1996. This is a far cry from an all out conversion of a university to a polytechnic.

For myself and many young people, this is the first local political issue of our lives that we have chosen to become involved with. It’s a great thing to see this involvement, but it’s also disturbing to think about the effects on this province and this city if we destroy our university status and settle for anything else. I will now cement this post as my longest so far on my blog by pasting at the bottom of this post a large part of a letter which I have sent to just about every politician in southern New Brunswick so far.

I would encourage you to do the same, and encourage your family and friends to do the same. There does appear to be a very quick timeline at which this is being pushed through, and it is very possible that we have only days, not weeks or months, to make our voices heard before the process advances too far.

Dear Politicians in New Brunswick: (NO, I didn’t actually this generic greeting, each politician received a customized version of this letter)

I have read the report presented by the Commission on Post-Secondary Education. In addition to this, I have done my own research on the issue, heard from well-connected individuals with the university (including Dr. Littlejohn who I understand is a good friend of yours), and attended the Rally and Delta presentation by the Commissioners on Monday. I do not believe the conversion of our Saint John university to any other type of institution is going to solve our problems. Frankly, I believe the loss of our university would be a tremendous blow to the community that would take us off the map.

After graduating from high school in 2004, I balanced both NBCC and UNBSJ as possible options, before finally deciding on UNBSJ. I appreciated having this choice here in Saint John because it empowered me with the freedom to choose the post-secondary school that worked best for MY needs, not the temporary needs of big business. Going to school here at home has allowed me to remain debt free, an impossibility if I was forced to study in another city. I have also had the option all along to obtain a specialized college education as well in a variety of fields, should I have the desired to do so. I do not need a new polytechnic to gain this ability.

I am now in my 4th year of Computer Science, scheduled to graduate next spring. I have truly benefited by being able to complete my degree here just minutes away from where I’ve grown up, and I am saddened to think that I may be one of the last people to be able to do this in Saint John. This is because on page 27, the Commission’s report states that the three polytechnics proposed would “offer first year of some university programs” and “can offer second year of some university programs where it is possible”. Other polytechnics in Canada offer degree programs, but only in conjunction with actual universities located in the same city. I guess it won’t be possible for our polytechnic to do this, since its creation would destroy our university. The report does not even try to hide this since the above statements confirm that 1st and 2nd years are all that would be retained of degree programs if we’re lucky, despite the Commissioner’s statements that few changes if any would be made to the academic programs.

The comparison of the Saint John Polytechnic to institutions such as MIT, Ryerson and Caltech is tempting, until it’s pointed out that these are former polytechnics that have transitioned to become full universities, which is entirely the opposite direction being proposed here. At the Delta presentation on Monday, Rick Miner cited Arizona State University as a university that has transitioned to become a polytechnic named Arizona State Polytechnic, surprising me since I believed that no university would consider this path. This is not a bad response on his part, if only it were true. A quick visit to Arizona State’s web site (http://www.asu.edu/) shows that they still call themselves a university, and that only one of its many campuses is a polytechnic which opened in 1996 (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_State_University). Clearly it’s a struggle to find a university anywhere that has transitioned entirely to a polytechnic. Saint John, Edmundston and Shippagan would be the first cities anywhere to destroy a university for any reason.

I am certainly not against a polytechnic in Saint John, nor am I against increased collaboration between UNBSJ and NBCC as separate institutions free to act independently. However, I firmly believe that any new opportunities must not come at the expense of our existing university structure that we have been building for 40 years that is only now becoming a major contender on the national and international level. We deserve both options in this city, and so do the residents of northern New Brunswick who have benefited from their Université de Moncton campuses as well.

This is one major issue in which many young people have chosen to become politically active for the first time in their lives and for good reason. Even though young people tend to ignore most political issues, this is one issue that is very important to all of us, and the entire community.

Please do everything you can to stand up for our rights, and the rights of young people who will be evaluating their own post-secondary options in future years. Don’t let our government sell our potential short for anything or anyone!

Sincerely,

Paul Saulnier

End of summer

Thursday, September 6th, 2007

School has started again, bringing the end to summer.

Here are a few more recent shots around Saint John.

400img_3988.jpg

The late afternoon sun reflects over Saint John Harbour.

400img_3993.jpg

Lily pads and debris floating in a lake near the Rockwood Park Golf Course.

400img_4049.jpg

A pleasant evening run through Rockwood Park.

A while ago, I talked about these ugly structures visible from Saint John Harbour:

img_3886.jpg

Aren’t they beautiful? They are gone now. I was told that these were from the old sugar refinery, but I definitely don’t remember so many large, tall things sitting there. Another person says they are related to LNG, but that’s all I was told. Yet someone else told me that these structures are in the process of being refurbished. Once ready, they will shipped to the United States perhaps to be used as anchors for ships and whatnot. She says that they are new, and were brought here off a ship.

That’s all for now.