Archive for December, 2008

Against the proposal to close Lorne, Saint John’s newest school building

Thursday, December 11th, 2008

In Saint John, the school district is looking at closing two middle schools in the North End: Lorne (my middle school), and Hazen White-St. Francis. This post is likely going to be my first of many.

The decision to close any school is always tough to discuss, but the first part of my rant will focus on a sad irony. My curiousity was peaked when I read a newspaper headline saying Chateau de Champlain lends helping hand to Hazen White-St. Francis School library. How sad, I thought, because this school stands a good chance of closing within a year due to its low enrollment, somewhat remote location, and an aged building, and efforts to support could be in vain to some extent.

In the picture above from the newspaper article I linked above, you’ll see a smiling district superintendent, Susan Tipper. This bugs me to some extent since she’ll go to the school smiling for the children and the cameras, and then perhaps return to her office to think about why this very school should close, which would mean students that currently walk would likely need to take a bus to another school.

This is particularly interesting because the NB Education Minister, Kelly Lamrock designated Lorne and Hazen White as Community Schools and their neighbourhoods as priority neighbourhoods in the province a year ago. Now School District 8 wants to close them. How does this make sense?

The following is a letter I submitted to District 8 to be considered as part of their decision in the “reorganization” of the north Saint John schools.

To whom it may concern:

I disagree with the proposal to close Lorne School. I am a graduate of UNBSJ. Prior to moving to Calgary to pursue my Masters in Computer Science, I lived in Millidgeville all my life. I chose to attend Lorne Middle School, and fondly recall my 3 years there.

Lorne has a strong case to stay open. Because most of the building burnt down in the 80′s, it was rebuilt, and is thus one of the newest and most modern school buildings in the Saint John area. It is also the only middle school in the older part of the city’s North End, which has been a struggling neighbourhood, as you know. Residents tired of the crime and other problems have come together to take back their neighbourhood, and have succeeded in making things better, even raising money to build their own police station to raise police presence in the neighbourhood. This is quite impressive to me, and gives me lots of optimism about the potential recovery of this neighbourhood.

Despite this, School District 8 wants to take away the only middle school in the Old North End, a designated community school, perhaps partially because of the perceptions of some parents who believe the neighbourhood is unsafe. If this is a real problem, shouldn’t we work on fixing the problems in the neighbourhood, instead of ghetto-izing it and assuming it will never improve? Obviously those supporting this proposal disagree or simply don’t care.

It’s easy to just get rid of a few smaller schools and bus them wherever. In many cases, the cost savings make sense. But I think such a proposal could be devastating to the Old North End neighbourhood in this case. The report on the district web site lists a bunch of advantages, but in an entirely unbalanced view, fails to list any possible disadvantages. So this proposal is absolutely perfect? The omission of any reference to the possible effects due to the projected “energy boom” for the Saint John area is particularly jarring to me. While school populations have been dropping, it’s not unreasonable to expect these populations to rise significantly once again if the energy boom materializes. How embarrassing will it be to have to have overcrowding in our schools a few years from now because we closed too many schools now without any forward vision?

I feel there are other solutions. If I recall correctly, there have been discussions about rebuilding Princess Elizabeth for years, implying that the days are numbered for the current building. Why is there no consideration about closing this aging school instead of a much newer Lorne school building? I am certain that a sensible solution could be determined that would have some or all of the savings presented in the proposal, while retaining Lorne School in the Old North End.

Thanks for your consideration of my remarks.

Paul Saulnier

You’ll notice my arguments largely are targetted towards Lorne, though most of the same factors apply to Hazen White-St. Francis as well. Moving forward, this proposal has to be accepted in entirety or not at all, so they will close neither school or close both.

You can read the proposal for yourself on the School District 8 web site. If you scroll to the last page, you’ll find an e-mail address where you too can make your feedback heard. It’s too late for written submissions, but there’s no deadline indicated for e-mail.

Additionally, you can write letters to the District Education Council and the Telegraph-Journal expressing your views on this. This is the type of action which actually gets things done. I’ll hopefully be doing more of this myself, and have my blog posts up soon.

Bring on the coalition

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008

As you have likely read for yourself, the Liberals, and NDP have agreed to form an “unprecedented” coalition government to replace Stephen Harper’s Conservatives. This coalition will also be supported by the Bloc Quebecois for at least 18 months. To make this happen, they need to bring down the Conservative government in a vote of non-confidence, which could happen on Monday. From there, the three opposition parties can tell the Governor General they have the confidence to form government together, and she can accept this or call an election. You can read the rest of the details for yourself.

At first, it’s tempting to buy into the Harper defence that all “Dion” is trying to do is steal power and go against Canadians’ wishes for who they want as Prime Minister. Some commenters on CBC are calling this a “coup”.

Come on people, let’s set the theatrics aside. This isn’t a coup, no matter how much Harper is going to kick and scream. A coup is when (according to Wikipedia) there is “sudden unconstitutional overthrow of a government”. Correct me if I’m wrong, but everything happening here is within the rules of a constitution. Furthermore, all individuals and parties involved were elected by Canadians. No, maybe YOU didn’t vote for them (of course no one voted for all of them), but they were elected. As for stealing power by way of a coalition, wasn’t this basically what Harper did when he gained power after merging his party with the PC party?

Coalition governments seem scary and wrong because they are new to us, but in reality, many countries in the world already use coalition governments regularly.  They probably look at Canada and think its scary and wrong that just one party usually has all the power, and that we really just alternate between 2.

Truth is, more Canadians voted for all of the opposition parties together than the Conservatives, since they still failed to gain a majority. This is despite the fact that Dion seemingly gave up support freely by proposing a new carbon tax, something that many people still don’t understand. Rest assured, this new “tax” suggestion is probably dead now, regardless of what benefits or problems it had, and Dion is still going to step aside in May anyway.

With a coalition, there is finally hope for alternate views in the House. It’s no longer a game between the Conservatives and the Liberals, since we will soon have NDP cabinet ministers. Although I am no expert, I predict the era of majority governments as we know it has ended. With this precedent, minority party supporters (NDP, Green, etc.) will finally begin to vote as they wish, instead of “strategically” voting for one of the two major parties. This will eat away at somewhat inflated support for these parties, but they won’t disappear entirely thanks to the benefits of how coalitions work. Although votes have never been “wasted” entirely (since all parties receive $1.95 for each vote they get), the prospect of coalitions will further discrease the perception of wasted votes in Canada.

Stability of government will no longer need to depend on just one party’s ability to satisfy everyone, a gargantuan task for any society that actually pays attention to politics. Emerging minority views (Green, NDP), which are particularly popular with young people, will play a role in government even before they reach mainstream level (if they ever do). This isn’t quite as far as some countries have gone with proportional representation, but it’s a step ahead for our country. Government representation is now one step closer to including everyone.

What do you think? Feel free to leave a comment.

San Diego – Sea World

Monday, December 1st, 2008

On the second last night of the conference, a banquet event was held at the nearby Sea World. Despite the park being mostly closed for the night, we were able to see the penquins!

These creatures are so clumsy on land, but so majestic when swimming in the water.

The penguin area is climate controlled to simulate their native southern hemisphere. Even the lighting is apparently controlled to go on and off as the sun rises and sets.

At the back, you could see a rarer variety of penguin best known for being “fatter” than the others. While other penguins can be seen in many places, this type can only be seen in three places on earth: San Diego, Australia and of course Antarctica. Interesting indeed!

This concludes my series of photos for San Diego. I hope you enjoyed them. You can find full size versions in my Gallery and also now on Flickr, for the time being anyway. I would be interested to know which site format you prefer.